نوع المستند : مقاله پژوهشی
المؤلف
أستاذ السطوح العالية(خارج الفقه والأصول) في حوزة العلمية، قم، إيران.
المستخلص
الكلمات الرئيسية
عنوان المقالة [English]
المؤلف [English]
One of the most important issues in Usul Fiqh (principles of jurisprudence), especially with the emergence of new jurisprudential issues, is to eliminate the shortcomings of Usul Fiqh in such a way that, in addition to answering the old issues, it can also solve new jurisprudential issues. This requires a change in the structure of Usul fiqh and expanding the scope of this science. The research method in this article is an analytical and comparative examination of jurisprudence topics, especially novel issues, and an analytical examination of jurisprudence in terms of structure and content according to the purpose of this science. This study aims to complete science in terms of structure, content and knowledge of the necessary rules to solve jurisprudential issues, especially novel issues. The result of the study suggests that Usul Fiqh with its famous structure and topics should be changed as follows: 1. It should be based on being a tool for discovering the Sharia and studying. 2. Enriching many issues that Usul Fiqh includes and clarifying its branches. 3. Referring to what is usually presented as sources in Usul Fiqh from the point of view of the Sunnis, to the discussion in Usul Fiqh, even on the assumption that their source is rejected, one should not neglect all its benefits. 4. Clarifying issues that are frequently used and resolving their ambiguities. 5. As in the first book of Usul Fiqh, (according to the term we use), the duties of those responsible for inference are discussed in detail, in the second book of Usul al-Fiqh, the duties of the exponents of Sharia should be dealt with and assuming that there is no proof of duty for them, it is necessary to examine the methods that the commentators of Sharia have paid attention to in explaining Sharia rulings.
الكلمات الرئيسية [English]
)